LASH N., The Notion of ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ Reason in Newman’s University Sermons: a Difficulty.
Heythrop Journal 11 (1970) 48 – 54.
STECK K. G., John Henry Newman zwischen Luther und Karl Barth.
Evangelische Theologie, 30 (Ja 1970) 1, 30-45.
SVAGLIC M. J., John Henry Newman: The Three Conversions.
Mid-Stream, 8 (Spr 1969) 3, 66-79.
MORALES J., El concepto de teología en John H. Newman.
Scripta Theologica, 1 (Jl-D 1969) 2, 315-375.
EVANS J. Wh., Lonergan and Newman on theology in the University.
Religious Education, Vol. 64 (1969) 3, 184-187.
ALTHOLZ J. L., On the Use of “Communicated” in the Rambler.
Victorian Periodicals Newsletter, Vol. 1, (Jan., 1968) 1, 28-29.
BARMANN L.F., The Liturgical Dimension of the Oxford Tracts, 1833-1841.
Journal of British Studies, vol 7 (May 1968) 2, 92-113.
WALGRAVE J. H., La théorie newmanienne du développement dogmatique et la théologie liberale.
Asprenas, XV (1968) 4, 258-262.
MCELRATH D., Richard Simpson and John Henry Newman: The Rambler, Laymen, and Theology.
The Catholic Historical Review, Vol. 52 (Jan., 1967) 4, 509-533.
PETITPAS H.M., Newman’s Idea of Science,
Personalist 48 (1967) 297 – 316.